- The Time Teacher Talk accounted for 48% of total student-teacher interaction, while the Student Talk was 19%.
- Content Emphasis accounted for 49% of the total time.
- Indirect Influence accounted for 0.18% while Direct Influence accounted for 1.62% of the total time.
- Comparing Teacher Question and Teacher Lecture (Teacher Question Ratio) the Teacher Question was 26% and the Teacher Lecture was 74%.
- Comparing Motivation and Control Behavior, Motivation Behavior was 55% and the Control Behavior was 45%
- Teachers responded with Indirect Influence to students’ comments more than Direct Influence. The Indirect Influence Response was 6% and the Direct Influence Response was 3%.
- Teachers responded to students’ comments by asking questions less than lecture, the Question Response was 47% and the Lecture Response was 53%.
- The Student Initiation was 4% of the Student Talk
- The Student Verbal Behavior was 67% and the Student Non-verbal Behavior was 33% of the total.
- The Student Purposeful Silence was 29% and the Student Non-purposeful Silence was 4% of the total.
In a study conducted by Nitsaisook (1985), the results of the study revealed that most teachers used primarily total teaching. About 10% of all classroom activities were spent on review and 30% on students’ seatwork. Small group work was rarely undertaken.
According to the primary school teachers’ performance, the Office of Ayuthaya Provincial Primary Education (1985) revealed that the average of teaching load was 25 periods per week. Almost all of the teachers did not perform as the curriculum required. Especially the “teacher-centered” approach was emphasized rather than the “student-centered”.
With respect to the number of students’ days of absence, Chantavanich’s study (1982) on “The Determinants of Primary School Efficiency” indicated that the greatest figure for students’ absence from school was 92 days during one school year while the lowest figure was 0. The average absence from school was 3.73 days.
Timphanphong (1984) carried out a study on a selected factor affecting school attendance rate of primary school students and found that the rates of school attendance were found highest in 3 educational zones (#9,10 and 11) for the Northeastern Region and 1 educational zone (#6) for the Central Region; and lowest in 1 educational zone (#2) for the Southern Region. Furthermore, variables affecting the low rate of school attendance were parents’ occupation in agriculture and student commuting time (over 31 minutes), dialects (for the Northeastern and the Southern Regions), and other religious beliefs (for the Southern Region).
A study undertaken by Parkpoom and Ruangsa-ard (1984) showed the findings that school attendance rates were higher in very large districts than the others. There was a tendency that students in very small districts were attending schools more regularly than those in other district sizes.